Ukraine calls for Russia to be declared ‘terrorist state’ after damning report | Ukraine

The head of Ukraine’s presidential office called for sweeping US and European sanctions targeting Moscow after an official report drafted by an international working group concluded that Russia should now be declared a “state sponsor of terrorism”.

The call came from Andrey Yermak, Ukraine’s second most powerful government official after President Volodymyr Zelensky, after Ukraine accused Russia of sabotaging Nord Stream pipelines, an accusation that adds to its claim that Russia demonstrated all the characteristics of a terrorist state under its rule. United States and International Law.

Such a designation, which the US administration has so far resisted, would allow secondary sanctions to be imposed on any entity or individual that trades or supports Russian government bodies, including state-owned banks. It would also allow US citizens and employees to sue Russia for monetary damages or compensation for personal injury or death caused by Russian state terrorism. Russians seeking to enter the United States will face severe restrictions.

Read:Ukraine war: Kyiv tells residents of liberated Kherson and Mykolaiv to leave before winter sets in

Yermak praised the current sanctions, but said the impact has not been decisive, adding: “It is often said that money is like water: it always finds a way to flow. To combat this, the West needs to double existing sanctions.”

He was speaking after a report by an international sanctions working group advising the Ukrainian government concluded that Russia had come up with a legal definition of a “terrorist state” under US and Canadian law. Such a designation has only been handed over to North Korea, Syria, Iran and Cuba, and would likely result in Russia’s complete expulsion from the financial system, and raise new questions about its status as a member of the United Nations Security Council.

“The essence of terrorism can be summed up as ‘deliberate and politically motivated acts of violence committed against non-combatant targets,'” said the report, which was prepared by prominent lawyers, economists and diplomats and published on Thursday.

Read:Iran’s youthful protests stoke uncertainty among political elite | Iran

She said the horrific events in Ukraine were “not one-off incidents.” [involving] Rogue elements of the Russian armed forces “but” were “designed and implemented with the specific intent of terrorizing the Ukrainian population.” Since the Russian state is the main culprit, the report said, it has gone beyond being a sponsor of terrorism.

Cases cited that could be considered terrorist include events in the Ukrainian town of Bucha, where international experts found evidence of rape, torture, waterboarding, sexual violence, and the firing of Russian missiles at a shopping mall in Kremenchug, killing at least 20 people. Dozens were wounded, and during the siege of Mariupol, when the Russian attack killed up to 22,000 civilians and destroyed 95% of the city.

It said at least 131,300 civilian homes, 188,100 cars, 934 educational facilities and 2,472 health care facilities were damaged.

The report was prepared by a sanctions committee that includes Michael McFaul, the former US ambassador to Russia, and commissioned by Yarmac.

The authors acknowledge that there is a risk that such an extreme measure could backfire, for example by scrapping the fragile deal to allow Ukrainian grain to be exported through the Black Sea. But they say mitigation measures are available, including the US government’s statement that its citizens cannot sue Russia individually, and thus gobble up the Russian state’s assets located abroad.

Read:More than 100 Rohingya refugees found on Indonesian beach after spending over a month at sea | World News

The report stated that “the gradual time is over.” “Through its actions in its war against Ukraine, the Russian Federation has met or exceeded any reasonable legal or political threshold to be designated as a State Sponsor of Terrorism in relation to other states and entities currently bearing the designation,” she said.

War crimes versus acts of terrorism are differences. The type, extent, and purpose of the deliberate, politically motivated violence deployed by the Russian state against Ukrainian non-combatants is horrific. It requires a response.”

Previous post
Where is Liz Truss? Prime Minister to face regional radio interviews in first appearance since economic crisis
Next post
Pension funds crisis forces £65bn bailout by Bank